Hey everyone,
Just confused on some use cases here. Why would you choose Particle Skinner over just using Active Rigid body? In the demo scene Dyverso_rigid_crosses.flw what is the point in wrapping all the crosses in particles instead of just using the built-in Active rigid bodies?
Is there some computation gains? Seems like it unnecessarily complicates things...
Thanks for any insight!
BR
Particle Skinner vs. Active Rigid body, why?
General Discussions about realflow, fluid simulations,...
Return to “General Discussion”
Jump to
- Main-Forum
- News
- General Discussion
- Job opportunities
- Gallery
- Finished Work
- Realflow Discussions
- Realflow
- RealFlow Renderkit
- Python-Scripting
- Python Tutorials and Resources
- User Scripts
- Realflow bug report
- Tutorials and Resources
- Application Specific
- Autodesk 3dsmax
- Autodesk Maya
- Cinema 4D
- RealFlow | Cinema 4D
- Houdini
- Forum-Support
- Forum Support
- Suggestions
- old discussions
- Challenge 2009
- Contest 2008
- Contest WIP
- CONTEST 2007 - see the results
- Contest gallery
- Contest WIP
- Challenge 2006
- Pull down it
- fumeFX
- Realflow 3
- RF3: Fluid simulation
- RF3: Rigidbody simulation
- RF3: Softbody / cloth simulation
- RF-Magazine
- RF-magazine
- Realflow 4
- RF4: Fluid simulation
- RF4: General topics
- RF4: Rigidbody simulation
- RF4: Softbody / cloth simulation
- Realflow 5
- RF5: Rigidbody simulation
- RF5: Softbody / cloth simulation
- RF5: General topics
- RF5: Fluid simulation
- sdk
- Realflow 2012
- General topics
- Rigidbody simulation
- Softbody / cloth simulation
- WetWork Plugins
- Refamo Real Flow plugin
- Other Plugins
- Introductions and OT
- Lightwave
- Softimage
- Others
- Work in progress
- 3rd party plugins
- IoSim Plugins
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests